Connect with us

Local

Africa: Africa Has a Debt Crisis – Momentum From G20 in South Africa Can Help Find Solutions

Published

on

40 Views

The end of South Africa’s G20 presidency does not mean the end of its ability or responsibility to promote the issues it prioritised during 2025. It can still advocate for action on some of these issues through its further participation in the G20 and in other international and regional forums.
In this article, I argue that going forward South Africa should prioritise the financial challenges confronting Africa that it championed in 2025.
South Africa established four overarching priorities for its G20 presidency. Two of them dealt with finance. One sought to “ensure debt sustainability for low-income countries”. The other was to mobilise finance for a just energy transition.
Follow us on WhatsApp | LinkedIn for the latest headlines
The importance of debt, development finance and climate to Africa’s future is clear. Over half of African countries are either in debt distress or at risk of being in distress. More than half of Africa’s population live in countries that are spending more on servicing their debt than on health and/or education.
In addition, 17 African countries experienced net debt outflows in 2023. This means that they were using more foreign exchange to pay their external creditors than they received in new debts that could be used to finance their development. The continent is also experiencing extreme weather events that are adversely affecting food security and human wellbeing.
In short, African countries are caught in a vicious cycle. The impacts of climate and their struggle to meet their debt obligations are interacting in ways that undermine their ability to meet their sustainable development goals.
South Africa’s priorities
South Africa’s priorities for its G20 presidency were ambitious. Success required meaningful action at three levels:
Awareness. South Africa would need to bring the international community to a better understanding of the nature of the debt and development finance challenges confronting African countries and of the consequences of failing to address them.
Process. South Africa would need to convince the G20 to correct the shortcomings in the Common Framework it had devised to deal with low-income countries seeking debt relief.
The examples of Zambia and Ghana showed that the Common Framework was cumbersome, slow and unduly favourable to creditors. For example the framework requires the debtor to engage separately with each group of its creditors in a sequential process. This means that it should not negotiate with its commercial creditors until it has successfully negotiated with its official creditors.
Commercial creditors can’t give debt relief until the official creditors are satisfied with their deal and are confident that the commercial creditors will not receive more favourable treatment from the debtor than they have received.
Another complication is the IMF’s multiple roles in debt restructurings as an advisor to and a creditor of the debtor countries. In addition, it does the debt sustainability analysis that determines the amount of debt relief that all other creditors are expected to provide to the debtor country in order for it to regain debt sustainability. The more optimistic its assessment, the smaller the contributions the various creditors, including the IMF, are expected to provide. These contributions can either be in the form of new funding or new debt terms.
Substance. The current debt restructuring process treats debt as a technical financial and legal problem rather than as the complex multifaceted problem that is experienced by debtor countries. The former perspective limits the scope of debtor-creditor negotiations to the terms of the financial contracts.
The negotiations focus on the adjustments that must be made to these terms because the debtor cannot comply with its originally accepted obligations. They treat as largely outside the scope of the discussions the adverse impact the debt situation has on the sovereign debtor’s other legal obligations and on the social, political, environmental and cultural situation in the debtor country.
This approach in effect leaves the debtor to deal with these other issues on its own. This artificial distinction between the debtors’ other legal obligations and those it owes to its creditors makes it very difficult for the debtor to escape the vicious debt, development and climate cycle in which it is trapped. It forces it to choose between its commitments to its creditors and its development obligations.
Over the course of 2025, South Africa has been very effective in raising awareness of the African debt crisis and its dire impact on African countries. South Africa persuaded the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors to issue a declaration on debt sustainability at the end of their October meeting.
The declaration is the G20’s eloquent acknowledgement of the problem and of the need for more discussion of how these debt issues are managed by both debtors and creditors. Unfortunately, it does not contain any firm G20 commitments on what it will do to remedy the situation.
There has not been substantial progress at the process and substance levels. This is unlikely to change in the remaining weeks of South Africa’s G20 presidency.
But there are three actions that South Africa can take beyond the end of its term to ensure that the African debt crisis continues receiving attention.
Three actions
First, it should ask a group like the African Expert Panel that it established to advise the president to prepare a technical report that identifies and analyses all the barriers to Africa accessing affordable, sustainable and predictable flows of external development finance.
This report should be submitted to the South African president in the first half of 2026. Next year, South Africa will still be a member of the G20 Troika, which consists of the current, immediate past and the incoming G20 presidents. Consequently, next year, it will still be able to table the report at the G20. South Africa can also use the report to promote action in other appropriate regional and global forums.
Second, South Africa and the African Union should create an African Borrower’s Club that is independent of the G20. This club should be a forum in which African sovereign debtors can share information and lessons learned about negotiating sovereign debt transactions and about responsible debt management. When appropriate, the club can work with regional African financial institutions.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.
The club, working with regional organisations like the African Legal Support Facility, can also sponsor workshops in which interested African sovereign debtors can share information and more critically assess their financing options. They can also work to improve their bargaining capacity in sovereign debt transactions.
The African Borrower’s Club should also be mandated to establish an African Sovereign Debt Roundtable that is modelled on the Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable. This entity should be an informal forum, based on the Chatham House Rule in which the various categories of stakeholders in African debt can meet to discuss the design of a sovereign debt restructuring process that is effective, efficient and fair and that adopts an holistic approach to a sovereign debt crisis.
Third, South Africa should capitalise on the fact that the impacts of climate, inequality, unemployment and poverty on Africa’s development prospects are now acknowledged to be macro-critical, and so within the IMF’s macro-economic and financial mandate. South Africa should call for a review of the IMF’s operating principles and practices and its governance arrangements.
This call should note that the multilateral development banks have been the object of G20 review for a number of years and that this has resulted in important enhancements in their capital frameworks and operating practices. On the other hand the IMF has not been subject to a similar review despite the fact that its operations have had to undergo possibility even more extensive revisions.
Danny Bradlow, Professor/Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Advancement of Scholarship, University of Pretoria
This article is republished from The Conversation Africa under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The G20 2025 in Johannesburg – A Defining Moment for the Global South
US Makes Clear It Will Oppose a G20 Johannesburg Leaders’ Declaration
AllAfrica publishes around 600 reports a day from more than 110 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.
AllAfrica is a voice of, by and about Africa – aggregating, producing and distributing 600 news and information items daily from over 110 African news organizations and our own reporters to an African and global public. We operate from Cape Town, Dakar, Abuja, Johannesburg, Nairobi and Washington DC.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.

source

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Local

Africa: Standard Bank Becomes First African Lender to Plug Into China's Cips

Published

on

11 Views

Standard Bank has become the first African bank to directly integrate with China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS), providing African companies with a faster route to pay Chinese suppliers in Renminbi, rather than routing transactions through the US dollar.
The integration removes an extra step long embedded in Africa-China trade flows, where companies typically settled invoices in dollars, exposing them to delays, higher fees and currency volatility.
The shift comes as Chinese imports continue to dominate African trade. Standard Bank’s 2024 Trade Barometer shows 34% of African firms now import from China, up from 23% a year earlier. China-Africa trade reached $134 billion in the first five months of 2025, driven largely by finished goods flowing into Africa and raw materials travelling the other way.
CIPS allows global banks to clear and settle cross-border RMB payments directly and in near real time. Standard Bank secured its licence in June and has already gone live across its digital channels. With operations in 21 African countries, the bank says RMB settlement could ease cash-flow strain for import-heavy sectors such as manufacturing, electronics and construction.
Keep up with the latest headlines on WhatsApp | LinkedIn
The move aligns with a broader global push for diversified payment systems as geopolitical shifts reshape trade financing.
Daba’s newsletter is now on Substack. Sign up here to get the best of Africa’s investment landscape
Key Takeaways
Standard Bank’s CIPS integration signals a notable step in the evolution of Africa-China trade, where the dominance of dollar-based settlement has long created friction for importers. Direct RMB clearing eliminates exposure to dollar liquidity shortages and exchange-control delays–issues that frequently affect African firms and complicate cash flow planning. By processing payments in real or near real time, CIPS also reduces operational risk for companies that source heavily from China. The bank’s move also reflects broader geopolitical shifts. As more countries create alternative payment channels to reduce reliance on the dollar, African lenders face pressure to modernise cross-border infrastructure. Standard Bank’s early adoption could give it an advantage among corporates seeking faster settlement and more predictable pricing. Longer term, the integration may influence how African central banks approach foreign-exchange management and deepen RMB usage in trade finance. If adoption accelerates, it could reshape settlement norms in one of Africa’s most important commercial corridors.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.
Read the original article on Daba Finance.
AllAfrica publishes around 600 reports a day from more than 110 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.
AllAfrica is a voice of, by and about Africa – aggregating, producing and distributing 600 news and information items daily from over 110 African news organizations and our own reporters to an African and global public. We operate from Cape Town, Dakar, Abuja, Johannesburg, Nairobi and Washington DC.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.

source

Continue Reading

Local

Africa: What's At Stake in the COP30 Negotiations?

Published

on

12 Views

As climate talks in Belém enter their final stretch, negotiators are working on three fronts: technical details, ministerial consultations, and Presidency-led discussions. Behind the jargon and complex frameworks lie fundamental choices for more than 190 countries – choices that could shape how the Paris Agreement, signed in 2015, is turned into real-world action.
In practical terms, the debates at COP30 revolve around three big questions:
1) How can countries ramp up climate action?
Keep up with the latest headlines on WhatsApp | LinkedIn
With the planet heating at record speed and climate disasters intensifying, cutting emissions and adapting to impacts dominate the agenda. Delegates are looking at key tools:
· Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs): National climate plans updated every five years. At COP30, countries are weighing new ways to boost ambition and speed up implementation.
· Phasing out fossil fuels: COP28 agreed to “transition away from fossil fuels.” Now, negotiators are debating whether to set a clearer, context-based roadmap for that shift.
· National Adaptation Plans (NAPs): 72 countries have submitted plans, but most lack funding. One proposal: triple adaptation finance by 2025.
· Global Goal on Adaptation: Talks focus on roughly 100 indicators to track progress on adaptation worldwide.
· Forest Finance Roadmap: Already backed by 36 governments representing 45 per cent of global forest cover and 65 per cent of GDP. It aims to close a $66.8 billion annual gap for tropical forest protection and restoration.
2) How can money and technology reach those who need it most?
Political promises alone won’t solve the climate crisis – they need real resources. COP30 negotiators are exploring ways to unlock finance and technology:
· Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement: Developed countries must support developing nations financially. Delegates are considering an action plan and accountability tools.
· Baku-to-Belém Roadmap to $1.3 trillion: A proposal to mobilize $1.3 trillion annually for developing countries, with five action areas and debt-free instruments under discussion.
· Loss and Damage Fund: Created at COP27 and launched at COP28 to help countries hit hardest by climate impacts. It arrives at COP30 underfunded, sparking calls for more contributions.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.
· Green Climate Fund: The world’s largest climate fund, but its latest replenishment cycle showed signs of decline.
· Global Environment Facility: Provides grants to developing countries, but current funding is seen as inadequate.
· Technology Implementation Programme: Aims to improve access to climate technologies, but negotiations remain divided over financial and trade barriers.
· Trade-restrictive unilateral measures: Climate-related trade policies that may disadvantage developing countries. One idea: create a platform to assess their impact.
3) How can climate action be fair and inclusive?
Even with funding, big transitions risk deepening inequalities unless they protect vulnerable communities. Negotiators are working on frameworks to ensure fairness:
· Just Transition Work Programme: Promotes social justice, decent work, and sustainable development. Countries expect a practical framework aligned with workers’ and communities’ realities.
· Gender Action Plan: Guides the integration of gender perspectives into climate action. The first plan was adopted in 2017; an updated version is due at COP30.
Why what happens in Belém matters
The choices made in Belém will shape how the Paris Agreement moves from words to action, and whether global climate goals remain within reach. Behind closed doors, the mood is clear: time is short, and compromise cannot wait. These decisions will shape not only the pace of emissions cuts but also whether justice is delivered for indigenous peoples, as well as Africa and developing nations, who bear the brunt of climate impacts despite contributing least to the crisis.
Read the original article on UN News.
AllAfrica publishes around 600 reports a day from more than 110 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.
AllAfrica is a voice of, by and about Africa – aggregating, producing and distributing 600 news and information items daily from over 110 African news organizations and our own reporters to an African and global public. We operate from Cape Town, Dakar, Abuja, Johannesburg, Nairobi and Washington DC.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.

source

Continue Reading

Local

Africa: China Injects R60m Into South Africa's HIV Prevention Efforts

Published

on

8 Views

China has announced a US$3.49 million (R60 million) partnership with South Africa to expand HIV prevention services among adolescents and young people, as well as people who inject drugs, over the next two years.
These two groups are among those considered key populations – people who are at high risk of HIV infection. Globally, young people between the ages of 15 to 24 account for more than a third of new infections, while people who inject drugs face disproportionately high risk due to limited access to harm-reduction services
Speaking at the launch event in Pretoria this week, health minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi says the $3.5 million grant comes at the right time, “when the funding for HIV prevention interventions is shrinking.”
The project aims to reach 54 000 adolescents and young people in 16 Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges across seven provinces. It will also support 500 people in Gauteng who inject drugs through harm reduction and opioid agonist therapy programmes.
Keep up with the latest headlines on WhatsApp | LinkedIn
HIV risk among adolescents
South Africa has the world’s largest HIV burden with about 8 million people living with HIV. New infections remain stubbornly high, especially among adolescent girls and young women.
“In this country, every day, 122 adolescent girls and young women acquire HIV, 1000 every week. This is not just a biological gap. It is a justice gap. We are failing them,” says Winnie Byanyima, UNAIDS executive director. “To prevent new infections in this group, we need to tackle gender inequality, poverty, and the violence that strips young women of power over their bodies, choices, and futures.”
The minister underscored the critical role of adolescents as a measure for the success – or failure – of the country’s HIV response. “They are not just beneficiaries. They are the barometer of our society’s future health,” he says.
Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Be in the know with our free weekly newsletter. We deliver a round-up of our top stories and insightful reads from across the web.
People who inject drugs
People who inject drugs are at a high risk of several diseases, including HIV. But this population group is pushed to the margins of society by restrictive laws that criminalise drug use and discriminatory attitudes that discourage health-seeking behaviours.
“People who inject drugs deserve health services that are tailor-made yet fully integrated. We ought not to be judgmental,” Motsoaledi says.
A major barrier to the provision of targeted services for this group, according to the minister, is limited evidence or data regarding opioid replacement and substitution therapy and services in the country. To address this gap, the department will implement pilot projects in two provinces.
“This will generate pragmatic lessons, informing strategic guidance, within the required legal framework. This financial support from China will be catalytic for South Africa to fast-track pilot activities and inform us better.”
The HIV care needs among people who inject drugs are the subject of new research published in the Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine. The study found that only 40% of people in this population who start antiretroviral therapy (ART) are still in treatment after six months. This means that for every 10 people who started HIV treatment, only four stayed on it long enough to sustain health benefits.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.
What’s particularly concerning about these findings is that, when HIV treatment is interrupted, the virus can rebound, raising the risk of transmission and drug resistance.
The last mile
Motsoaledi believes that South Africa can eradicate HIV in much the same way that smallpox was eradicated. But this will require aggressive and targeted prevention strategies to reach communities that are falling through the cracks.
“This is our last mile for eradicating HIV as a public health threat. Therefore, there’s no room for waiting. No space to delay,” the minister says.
“Let us not pretend that these issues are easy. Substance and drug abuse, young people’s vulnerability, and high HIV prevalence among key populations are the uncomfortable battlegrounds of modern public health.” – Health-e News
This article is republished under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
AllAfrica publishes around 600 reports a day from more than 110 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.
AllAfrica is a voice of, by and about Africa – aggregating, producing and distributing 600 news and information items daily from over 110 African news organizations and our own reporters to an African and global public. We operate from Cape Town, Dakar, Abuja, Johannesburg, Nairobi and Washington DC.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.

source

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 an24.africa