Snap survey conducted by PMNCH reveals global funding crisis threatening health and rights programs for women, children, and adolescents.
Geneva, 20 October 2025  – A new global survey by the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH) has revealed alarming funding disruptions facing organizations working to protect and promote the health and rights of women, children, and adolescents worldwide.
“This is not just a financial crisis—it’s a human one,” said Rajat Khosla, Executive Director at PMNCH. “As funding dries up, frontline organizations are being forced to scale back or suspend services that millions of women and children depend on. The world cannot afford to lose this momentum.”
A Global Call for Support
Follow us on WhatsApp | LinkedIn for the latest headlines
The Survey based on responses from partner organizations in over 20 countries across Africa, Latin America, and South-East Asia, highlights a cascading impact of global disruptions – from reduced donor support to geopolitical instability and misinformation – that is undermining the delivery of women’s, children’s, and adolescents’ health (WCAH) services.
Key findings include:
Frontline Fallout
Programs targeting adolescent sexual and reproductive health, maternal and newborn care, and community-based services have been among the hardest hit. Respondents described halted outreach, reduced staff, and broken trust with local communities.
One partner explained that “mobile clinics [have been] cut from three days to one – fewer pregnant women reached; vaccinations interrupted” while another shared that “training [has been] halted. Staff laid off overnight. Months of trust building set back in a day.”
These disruptions are occurring amid compounding challenges, including shifting public health priorities (39%), reduced access to decision-making spaces (37%), growing misinformation—especially around SRHR (30%)—and new legal or policy restrictions on advocacy and civil society engagement (26%).
Abrupt Changes Erode Trust
The sudden halting of programs has had deep consequences for communities. One respondent described: “On 31st January, we were instructed to stop the implementation of our health programme with effect from 1st February. This abrupt decision had a devastating impact… The sudden halt not only affected direct service delivery but also undermined the trust built with communities and government counterparts.”
Such testimonies reveal how abrupt funding cuts and program suspensions can undo years of progress, strain community relationships, and limit opportunities to scale successful, locally led initiatives.
SRHR Programmes Suffer from Funding Cuts and Pushback
Respondents repeatedly cited sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) as one of the most vulnerable areas. One partner said the “normative ecosystem is being challenged by SRHR pushback [in addition to] donor funding,” while another shared that “Our in-school adolescent health programme has been suspended due to a lack of government commitment to sustain funding.”
Another respondent emphasized that “the most critical cuts have been in sexual and reproductive health and rights programming… there is growing uncertainty among staff, youth leaders, and communities.” Others described widespread program reductions, from family planning advocacy to GBV prevention and STI reduction efforts. One respondent noted: “The funding cuts have led to a reduced number of staff who are able to engage in advocacy both at the global and national level. This is highly concerning, especially in a landscape where pushback against SRHR and Women’s rights is highly organized.”
Partners also cited increasing resistance to SRHR programming due to sociopolitical pushback and anti-gender movements. One partner stated: “Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Programs like Safe Abortion, Comprehensive Sexuality Education, Youth-led Advocacy… have had to scale down due to restrictions on content, reduced funding, and sociopolitical pushback.”
Health Workforce Among the Hardest Hit
Training and capacity building of the health workforce has emerged as one of the most pressing areas of concern in the survey. Partners report that essential training programmes, staff development, and technical support activities have been curtailed or closed entirely due to funding shortages.
A representative from a midwifery association shared that “several Midwifery Associations at the national level immediately closed programmes and training due to a lack of funding.” Similarly, a respondent from a nursing institution reported that “Nursing education in-country; had to reduce staff and funding for in-country activities has been difficult.”
Respondents pointed to system-wide consequences: “Quality improvement and system strengthening programmes at hospital and health centre (secondary and primary) levels have been impacted through reduction in available funding for existing and new programmes.”
Partners described how funding constraints have eroded the stability of their workforce: “The scale of work had to be reduced in some areas due to funds constraint. Also, another major hindrance has been limited support from the policy makers.” Another respondent added: “Due to reduced scale & implementation of programmes, one of the challenges has been limited investment in hiring, retaining and nurturing talent which again affects scale and sustainability of programmes.”
The effect is visible at all levels of health systems. “Reduced staffing and due to reduced funding, reduced scale, technical support to countries and community groups,” one respondent said, while another noted, “We have not been able to create and promote new health education content, train additional Ministry of Health staff on media use, or provide solar powered projectors to the Ministry of Health.”
The abruptness of these changes has also taken a human toll. “Training halted. Staff laid off overnight. Months of trust-building set back in a day,” said one respondent. Another summarized the broader reality: “Our programmes are now maintained at a minimum operational level… This has left many vulnerable women, children, and adolescents without sustained access to essential health and rights services.”
Short-Term Projects Replace Long-Term Community Engagement
Many partners highlighted a troubling shift from sustained, community-based approaches to short-term, outcome-specific projects. One respondent explained: “Adolescent Health and Well-being… programmes have had to be scaled back due to resource constraints… donor funding has shifted away from long-term, community-based engagement to shorter-term, outcome-specific projects.”
Another noted that “Women’s Health and Empowerment Initiatives: Community-based interventions around maternal health, GBV prevention, and workplace health programmes (e.g., women in factories) have experienced interruptions.” This trend, several partners warned, weakens the continuity of care, erodes community trust, and undermines long-term impact. One organization added: “Research and Development has also been one of the areas impacted which is crucial for supporting new models & innovations in women’s, children’s and adolescent’s health.”
Other respondents observed that donor expectations for rapid results are crowding out investments in social mobilization and capacity building. One stated: “Influencing larger ecosystems, including organising & attending conferences, has been a challenge. This has further restricted our ability to showcase grounded evidence practices at larger platforms.”
Together, these voices point to an urgent need to rebalance funding priorities toward sustained, community-owned approaches that reinforce system resilience rather than short-term project cycles.
Adolescents and Youth Engagement Reduced
Youth-focused programs have been severely disrupted. One respondent noted: “Within our organization, programmes focusing on adolescent and youth engagement in health and rights have been significantly affected… Due to uncertainty in funding and legal and policy restrictions on donors, these programmes have…been put on hold.”
Many others echoed this concern, citing the loss of safe spaces and mentorship structures for young advocates. One respondent said: “Our adolescent sexual and reproductive health outreach, which previously reached schools and youth centers, has been reduced in scale due to funding constraints.”
Others emphasized how youth leadership is being sidelined and warned that when young people are excluded from advocacy and dialogue, opportunities for meaningful participation in shaping healthier, more equitable policies are lost. As one partner put it: “This disruption has limited opportunities for adolescents and youth to actively engage in shaping healthier policies, even though their voices are central to protecting future generations from the harms of tobacco, E-cigarettes, and alcohol.”
Advocacy, Capacity Building, and Engagement Curtailed
Beyond service delivery, advocacy and capacity-building efforts have also been deeply constrained. One advocate reported: “The funding cuts have led to a reduced number of staff who are able to engage in advocacy both at the global and national level… especially in a landscape where pushback against SRHR and Women’s rights is highly organized.”
A youth-led organization added further context: “Activities like workshops, awareness campaigns, and community outreach projects have faced the following impacts: Reduced in scale… Suspended… [and] Shifted online,” diminishing the reach and effectiveness of their work.
Other partners emphasized the ripple effects of limited resources on coalition building and coordination. One respondent highlighted “the need for PMNCH to facilitate collaboration between stakeholders globally in advance of key decision-making moments such as WHA and UNGA.”
These reflections underline the urgent need to strengthen collective advocacy, peer learning, and access to decision-making platforms to sustain partner momentum.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.
Partners’ Priorities for Resilience
Despite these setbacks, PMNCH partners remain steadfast in their commitment to advancing WCAH. Their top strategies for resilience include:
Partners also expressed a strong desire for collaboration and shared problem-solving. “Would be good to collaborate more with partners on helping countries to become less dependent on external aid,” one respondent said. Another added: “It would be a great idea for member organizations in Nigeria to host regular meetings to strategize on ways of mitigating common challenges.”
A grassroots NGO echoed the urgency of collective action: “As a grassroots NGO in rural and tribal areas, we see adolescent girls and children most at risk… To sustain and expand our programmes, we need stronger pooling of local and international financial support.”
“Partners are calling for solidarity, not charity,” said Helen Clark, Board Chair at PMNCH. “They know what works. What they need are the resources and political space to keep doing it.”
About the Survey
The  Partner Survey gathered insights from 103 organizations across Africa, Latin America, and South-East Asia. Respondents represented a range of PMNCH constituencies, including non-governmental organizations (58%), youth groups (18%), and academic and research institutions (15%). The majority operate at the country level (63%), with strong engagement on adolescent, maternal, and child health, as well as SRHR.
Call to Action
PMNCH is calling on donors, policymakers, and global leaders to protect and expand financing for women’s, children’s, and adolescents’ health, and to prioritize flexible, long-term funding that enables local organizations to adapt quickly and respond to evolving crises.
“Hold the line on WCAH,” urged Rajat Khosla, Executive Director of PMNCH. “Every delay, every funding cut, risks reversing years of progress. We need sustained investment and coordinated action to ensure that no woman, child, or adolescent is left behind.”
AllAfrica publishes around 600 reports a day from more than 110 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.
AllAfrica is a voice of, by and about Africa – aggregating, producing and distributing 600 news and information items daily from over 110 African news organizations and our own reporters to an African and global public. We operate from Cape Town, Dakar, Abuja, Johannesburg, Nairobi and Washington DC.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.

source