Connect with us

Local

Africa: Can Rwanda's War Against Colonial Ideology Spark Africa's Renaissance?

Published

on

114 Views

Since the African continent was divided at the Berlin Conference of 1884-1885, the struggle for its wealth has played out on two fronts. The first was political, as European powers, starting with King Leopold II of Belgium, sought to exploit Africa’s resources.
The second was ideological, designed by Belgium, the Vatican, and Germany to weaken strong African tribes by fostering internal divisions.
One of the most destructive ideological tools was the Hamitic versus Bantu theory, a construct that fueled perpetual ethnic conflicts across the continent. This theory ultimately contributed to the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda, where the so-called Bantu were manipulated into exterminating the so-called Hamitic.
On the political front, King Leopold II exploited the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) from 1885 as his private property, and after his death, he bequeathed it to the Kingdom of Belgium.
The Ideological Front: A colonial legacy
Although ideological manipulation continued after African nations gained independence, it took on new dimensions after the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi. The architects of the genocide ideology, acting in the name of the Bantu, extended their campaign of extermination into former Belgian colonies, particularly the DRC and Burundi.
When European colonialists arrived in Africa, their first move was to weaken tribes they perceived as powerful threats to their rule. To reinforce their agenda, so-called scientists from Belgium, France, Britain, and Germany refined the Hamitic versus Bantu theory, which they used to justify the existence of distinct African “tribes” or “races.”
In a pastoral letter, Bishop André Perraudin, the Vicar Apostolic of Kabgayi, stated: “Among the Africans, there are the Batutsi, the Bahutu, and the Batwa.” Some may assume this was Perraudin’s personal interpretation, but it was a widespread colonial perspective.
The White Fathers, a Catholic missionary group, reinforced the idea that the Batutsi/Hamitic peoples across Africa had to be eliminated or weakened by the Bahutu/Bantu.
One White Father, Alphonse Brard, wrote: “Today, the Batutsi no longer have a future; the arrival of Europeans will ruin their power everywhere.” This ideology was a Belgian creation, supported by the Vatican through the White Fathers.
The Birth of the White Fathers
Following the Berlin Conference, European powers signed the General Act of Berlin, formalizing colonization and trade regulations in Africa. European explorers had already surveyed the continent and formulated views on its people.
In 1899, German explorer Richard Kandt remarked: “Rwanda is a country full of hope, when we could destroy the power of the Watusi.”
The question was not just about destroying the Batutsi’s power but also about weakening other strong African tribes. A discussion between King Leopold II and Pope Leo XIII, known as “The Diplomat Pope,” led to the creation of an organization to help subdue these tribes.
In 1868, three years after the Berlin Conference, Charles Lavigerie founded the White Fathers, also known as the Missionaries of Africa.
Officially, they aimed to educate and Christianize Arab orphans from the 1867 famine and convert Arabs and Africans to Christianity. However, their real purpose was to dismantle or weaken African tribes that resisted European exploitation.
By 1884, Pope Leo XIII had already permitted the King of Belgium to deploy White Fathers in his Congo project. Many of them came from the Scheut Fathers, a congregation based in a suburb of Brussels, to support Leopold II’s African ambitions.
Deployment of the White Fathers
With support from Leopold II, Otto von Bismarck, and Pope Leo XIII, Charles Lavigerie established his headquarters in Algeria and began deploying White Fathers across Africa.
Though no written documents explicitly outline their mission, the directives given to those sent by Leopold II to the Congo–detailed in “A Tentative Answer to Why the Vatican Wants the Beatification of Baudouin”–indicate their role in facilitating colonial exploitation and suppressing African resistance.
Lavigerie deployed White Fathers strategically across Africa. In Rwanda, Burundi, and eastern DRC alone, he assigned figures such as Bishop Léon-Paul Classe (Rwanda), Archbishop Louis Van Steene (Bukavu, DRC), Bishop Alphonse Joseph Matthysen (Bunia, DRC), and Bishop Joseph Germain Martin (Burundi), among others.
Their influence extended across West Africa (Senegal, Mali, Burkina Faso, Chad, Sudan, Eritrea, Algeria) and Southern Africa (Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia, Botswana, Angola, Namibia).
The White Fathers played a key role in consolidating European rule. In the DR Congo, they operated unchallenged from 1885 until the emergence of resistance leader Patrice Lumumba, who was assassinated for his defiance.
In Rwanda, they encountered resistance from King Mutara III Rudahigwa, who was later assassinated in Bujumbura, reportedly with Belgian complicity.
The Bantu versus Hamitic ideology continued in Rwanda until 1994, when the Rwandan Patriotic Army (RPA) stopped the genocide against the Tutsi. However, the genocide ideology persists through groups like the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) and the political environments in Kinshasa and Bujumbura.
Can the fight against colonial ideology ignite Africa’s renaissance?
During Africa’s independence struggles, Frantz Fanon famously said: “Africa is shaped like a pistol, whose trigger is in the Congo. Whoever has their finger on the trigger has the power to build or destroy the continent.” He emphasized the DR Congo’s symbolic role in Pan-African resistance against colonialism, warning that Africa’s fate was tied to events in Congo.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.
When Fanon spoke these words, Belgium had its finger on the trigger, exploiting the DR Congo’s wealth from 1885 until independence. Afterward, Belgium sought to share control with other European powers.
Who has their finger on the trigger today? The leader who dismantles tribalism and limits European interference in the DR Congo will shape Africa’s future. With West Africa advancing toward liberation, East Africa making steady progress, and Central Africa awaiting the DR Congo’s emancipation, the stakes are high.
The M23/AFC’s recent advances in the DR Congo indicate a shift in power dynamics. If the genocide ideology in the region is neutralized, the pistol that Fanon described may finally be silenced. The DR Congo, long viewed as the focal point of Pan-African resistance, could instead become the trigger for Africa’s renaissance.
A liberated DR Congo could catalyze the continent’s rebirth, shifting political and economic decision-making from Brussels, Paris, and London to African capitals. The seeds of this transformation have already been planted in various African nations. The question now is: Who will pull the trigger for Africa’s true independence?
Read the original article on New Times.
AllAfrica publishes around 500 reports a day from more than 110 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.
AllAfrica is a voice of, by and about Africa – aggregating, producing and distributing 500 news and information items daily from over 110 African news organizations and our own reporters to an African and global public. We operate from Cape Town, Dakar, Abuja, Johannesburg, Nairobi and Washington DC.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.

source

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Local

Africa: Risks Persist, Especially for Africa, With U.S. Tariff Pause, Says WTO Chief Okonjo-Iweala

Published

on

2 Views

Geneva — The head of the World Trade Organization says a temporary tariff pause by the United States mitigates current trade contraction, but substantial downside risks persist, which can heavily impact Africa.
WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala released the Global Trade Outlook at the WTO on April 16, warning of global dangers with the U.S. and China “decoupling” their economies.
She said at a press conference that the world’s merchandise trade volume will likely fall by 0.2 percent in 2025 under current conditions.
North America’s decline is expected to be particularly steep, and its exports are forecasted to drop by 12.6 percent, while Ngozi noted that some of Africa’s poorest countries, such as Lesotho, will be hard hit.
“A decoupling between the two major economies (the U.S. and China) could have far-reaching consequences if it were to contribute to a broader fragmentation of the global economy along geopolitical lines into two isolated blocks,” said Ngozi.
She said imposing “reciprocal” tariffs could lead to broader policy uncertainty, and these could trigger a sharper decline of 1.5 percent in global goods trade and hurt export-oriented least-developed countries (LDCs).
‘This is because Africa’s trade with the U.S. is relatively small’
“Exempting LDCs from all tariff increases would raise their exports, support their growth, and, in essence, help to create new markets,” said Ngozi.
She said that Africa’s economic outlook is broadly stable under current trade policies, with real GDP growth for the continent essentially unchanged, even if reciprocal tariffs are reinstated.
“This is because Africa’s trade with the U.S. is relatively small. The share of Africa’s exports to the U.S., as a percentage of its total exports to the world, is about 6.5 percent.”
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.
Ngozi said the share of Africa’s imports from the U.S. of its total imports is around 4.4 percent, with differences across countries.
“Some countries, like Lesotho, are particularly vulnerable due to their high reliance on textile exports to the U.S. market,” she observed.
Such exports are about $240 million or 10 percent of Lesotho’s. GDP,
“Cote d’Ivoire is another example. The largest cocoa producer in the world has about $800 million in exports to the U.S.,” said Ngozi.
Vulnerable to smuggling
U.S. tariffs can make Cote d’Ivoire’s cocoa vulnerable to smuggling to neighbouring Ghana, an “unintended consequence.”
“By 2050, 25 percent of the world’s population will be in Africa, whilst the present trade situation is being sorted out,” Ngozi said.
The Nigeria-born WTO chief pleaded for possible tariff exemptions for most of Africa since this is where most least developed countries are found.
Africa has 32 of the 44 least developed countries (LDCs), and Ngozi said that the continent needs “more self-reliance.”
“The external environment has changed and is more adverse. Aid is drying up, and trade is becoming more politicized,” said the WTO chief.
“So there needs to be a focus on raising domestic resources, attracting domestic regional and foreign investments on faster and greater trade integration within the continent, such that intra-Africa trade is lifted well beyond the current 16 percent,” said Ngozi.
She noted that Africa imports an estimated $7 billion of textiles, and Lesotho’s $240 million could be absorbed within Africa.
AllAfrica publishes around 500 reports a day from more than 110 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.
AllAfrica is a voice of, by and about Africa – aggregating, producing and distributing 500 news and information items daily from over 110 African news organizations and our own reporters to an African and global public. We operate from Cape Town, Dakar, Abuja, Johannesburg, Nairobi and Washington DC.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.

source

Continue Reading

Local

Mongolia to deepen ties with Zambia

Published

on

6 Views

By Mark Ziligone

Mongolian President UKHNAAGIIN KHURELSUKH has reaffirmed his country’s commitment to strengthening bilateral relations with Zambia.

President KHURELSUKH says his country will remain committed to international cooperation particularly through platforms such as the United Nations and other global organizations.

He has highlighted key areas for potential collaboration, including mining, agriculture, and tourism sectors adding that they are critical to the development agendas of both countries.

President KHURELSUKH was speaking when Zambia’s ambassador to Mongolia IVAN ZYUULU presented letters of credence to him at State House in Ulaanbaatar.

The Mongolian President welcomed the Ambassador and expressed confidence that the new envoy will help deepen the diplomatic and economic ties between Zambia and Mongolia.

And Mr. ZYUULU praised Mongolia’s expertise in mineral exploration and sustainable agriculture, expressing Zambia’s interest in drawing lessons and forming partnerships for mutual benefit.

Meanwhile Mongolia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, BATMUNKH BATTSETSEG reaffirmed his country’s readiness to work closely with Zambia and to explore new avenues of cooperation.

This is contained in a statement issued to ZNBC News by Second Secretary for Communications at the Zambian Embassy in Beijing, China CATHERINE KASHOTI.

The post Mongolia to deepen ties with Zambia appeared first on ZNBC-Just for you.

source

Continue Reading

Local

Africa: Trump Wants World to Subsidise US Empire

Published

on

7 Views

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia — Donald Trump’s top economic advisor claims the President has weaponised tariffs to ‘persuade’ other nations to pay the US to maintain its supposedly mutually beneficial global empire.
Geopolitical economist Ben Norton was among the first to highlight the significance of Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers chairman Stephen Miran‘s briefing at the Hudson Institute.
The Institute is funded by financiers such as media czar Rupert Murdoch, who controls Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, and other conservative media.
Miran made his case just after Trump’s electoral victory in A User’s Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System. Miran attempts to rationalise Trump’s economic policies, which are widely seen as at odds with conventional wisdom and reason.
Enhancing US dominance
Miran defends Trump’s tariffs as part of an ambitious economic strategy to strengthen US interests internationally with a “generational change in the international trade and financial systems”.
“Our military and financial dominance cannot be taken for granted, and the Trump administration is determined to preserve them”. Miran claims the US provides two major ‘global public goods’, both “costly to us to provide”.
First, Miran claims US military spending provides the world a ‘security umbrella’ that others should also pay for. Second, the US issues the dollar and Treasury bonds, the main reserve assets for the liquidity of the international monetary and financial system.
Miran seems blissfully unaware of longstanding complaints of US ‘exorbitant privilege’. The dollar’s reserve currency status has provided seigniorage income to the US while Treasury bond sales have long financed US debt at very low cost.
Miran’s case for Trump
The White House has threatened others with high tariffs unless they make concessions, at their own expense, benefiting the US. Miran’s defence of tariffs is indirect, as part of an ostensible grand strategy.
“The President has been clear that the United States is committed to remaining the reserve [currency] provider”, Miran added. He claims US dollar hegemony is “great” and denies “dollar dominance is a problem”.
While this “has some side effects, which can be problematic”, Miran “would like to … ameliorate the side effects, so that dollar dominance can continue for decades, in perpetuity”.
For Miran, these side effects are supposedly largely adverse while ignoring the benefits to the US. Chronic US trade deficits have been possible and financed by mounting US debt, enabling the dollar to serve as a global reserve currency.
Hence, US trade deficits have been sustained since the 1960s, rather than “unsustainable”, as he alleges. US manufacturing has been “decimated” by its consumers and transnational corporations, not by an extensive foreign conspiracy.
Miran’s Guide acknowledged the ‘Triffin dilemma’. In 1960, Robert Triffin warned that the dollar’s status as global reserve currency posed problems and risks for US monetary policy.
He invokes Triffin to argue that the US must import more than it exports to provide liquidity to the world, which needs dollars for international trade and to hold as reserves.
Miran adopts the Trumpian narrative of only blaming others. However, the US expected to benefit from continuing trade surpluses at Bretton Woods. In 1944, it opposed alternative payments arrangements to deter excessive trade surpluses.
US trade deficits have grown since the 1960s with post-World War II reconstruction of the Global North and uneven ‘late industrialisation’ in the Global South.
The empire must pay
The Trump administration wants to eat its cake and still have it. It intends to strengthen US empire while minimising adverse side effects and costs.
Miran wants foreign nations to “pay their fair share” in five ways. First, “countries should accept tariffs on their exports to the US without retaliation”. Tariffs provide revenue, which has financed its global public goods provision. Second, they should buy “more US-made goods”.
Third, they should “boost defense spending and procurement from the US”. Fourth, they should “invest in and install factories in America”. Fifth, they should “simply … help us finance global public goods”, i.e., foreign aid should go to or via the US.
Miran then emphasises that Trump “will no longer stand for other nations free-riding”, and calls for “improved burden-sharing at the global level”.
“If other nations want to benefit from the US geopolitical and financial umbrella, then they need to … pay their fair share”, i.e., the world must “bear the costs” of maintaining US empire.
Trump dilemmas 2.0
Trump wants to use tariffs to force countries with trade surpluses with the US to buy more from the US. Ending these deficits would undermine dollar hegemony, which, paradoxically, Trump obsessively wants to preserve.
Miran wants other countries to convert their US Treasury bills into 100-year bonds at very low interest rates, effectively subsidising the US over the long term. He also wants nations running trade surpluses with the US to buy more long-term US Treasury securities.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.
Trump has threatened 100% tariffs on BRICS members and all countries promoting de-dollarisation or undermining dollar hegemony in the international monetary system.
During his first term, Trump wanted to do the near-impossible by boosting exports while preserving a strong dollar!
Miran acknowledges that the “root of the economic imbalances lies in persistent dollar overvaluation that prevents international trade balancing”. But he also insists that dollar “overvaluation is driven by inelastic demand for reserve assets”.
Trump now hopes to kill both US trade and fiscal deficit birds by cutting imports and raising revenue with higher tariffs. He also wants the world to continue using dollars despite the US budget and trade deficits and policy uncertainties.
Meanwhile, official US debt, financed by selling Treasury bonds, continues to grow. Trump has to deliver his promised tax cuts soon before his earlier measures run out. Trump is falling foul of his bluster and may have to revert to the status quo ante while denying it.
Despite Miran’s best efforts, he cannot provide a coherent rationale for Trump’s rhetoric. But dismissing Trump as ‘mad’ or ‘stupid’ obscures the impossible dilemma due to and obscured by post-war US dominance.
IPS UN Bureau
Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau
Read the original article on IPS.
AllAfrica publishes around 500 reports a day from more than 110 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.
AllAfrica is a voice of, by and about Africa – aggregating, producing and distributing 500 news and information items daily from over 110 African news organizations and our own reporters to an African and global public. We operate from Cape Town, Dakar, Abuja, Johannesburg, Nairobi and Washington DC.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.

source

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 an24.africa