Connect with us

Local

Africa: The African Union Commission At a Crossroads

Published

on

44 Views

With elections for new commissioners in February 2025, member states must decide what kind of commission they want.
One weakness of the African Union’s (AU) Agenda 2063 economic growth and development plan is that it focuses more on goals than how to achieve them. In particular, the plan says little about the structure of the AU Commission, which is the secretariat and engine that implements the continental body’s agenda.
Adopted in 2014, ‘Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want’ sets the framework for most AU programmes and development projects. Now, 20 years after the AU was formed and a decade after Agenda 2063’s launch, the organisation must redefine the roles, prerogatives and ambitions of the AU Commission.
What kind of commission is needed to achieve Agenda 2063, and who should inform this decision? As the AU becomes a foreign policy actor – with its admission into the G20 in 2023 – it is important to reflect on a long-term vision for the commission.
In this regard, the AU’s institutional reform launched in 2017 has been a missed opportunity. Rather than providing a clear vision for the commission, the process merely highlighted its stormy relationship with the Permanent Representatives Committee – the forum of member state representatives to the AU.
Member states perceived the commission as inefficient and badly structured, so the institutional reforms aimed to reduce its size by rationalising some departments. Other goals included more financial accountability, greater efficiency, and a clear division of labour between the AU and regional economic communities (RECs).
As a result, the commission now boasts larger departments in terms of their scope, but with limited capacity and questionable efficiency. The division of labour between the AU and RECs has also not improved.
The reforms have not resolved the contradictions and ambiguities in the AU legal frameworks related to subsidiarity. This fuels competition between the AU and regional blocs, shifting their focus away from effectiveness to owning solutions. As a result, the commission is sidelined during peacemaking in favour of regional blocs who struggle to pacify their member countries.
Few member states favour a more independent commission that actively engages in conflict prevention and engagements with RECs. African states are protective over their sovereignty and emphasise the AU’s intergovernmental nature, so they prefer a commission with limited scope, mandate and resources; one that is more reactive than proactive and importantly, responds to their needs.
African countries are right in pointing to the numerous pockets of strategic and operational inefficiencies in the commission’s day-to-day management. And fixing the commission alone won’t make the AU more efficient. However, as a central organ of the continental body, meaningful reform is vital.
The name change from secretariat to commission added little in terms of autonomy and efficiency. And while some elements of competition have been added to the selection of commissioners, regional representation appears to be more important than competence.
The AU Commission chair has no say in the choice of commissioners – they are all elected at the same time. And the chair’s authority over commissioners and ability to oversee their performance is stifled due to limitations on the chair’s functions.
Beyond its stated commitment to integration, the AU remains legally and politically strongly intergovernmental. It aims to increase cooperation among African countries, but regional integration is hampered by low levels of trade and scientific and cultural collaboration.
The AU claims to be people-centred and citizen-driven. However, creating a Pan-African Parliament and the recent drive towards youth involvement have done little to free the AU from its intergovernmental and elitist trap. Ordinary citizens have limited experience of and with the AU, despite efforts in recent years by specialised agencies, such as the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention during COVID-19.
The AU is far from a supranational organisation with binding rules like the European Union. It is in fact closer to the United Nations.
The AU Charter, the Protocol establishing the Peace and Security Council, and Agenda 2063 all refer to shared African values. But the mechanisms to disseminate and protect those values are either limited in scope or undermined by member states themselves. Regional courts of justice are facing severe headwinds from embattled governments who renege on their commitments.
As an elite project born from the ideology of historic Pan-Africanism, the AU has – particularly through its African Peace and Security Architecture – fostered cooperation among member states. Stakeholders widely agree that this cooperation should be taken to the next level to avoid the total erosion of consensus among countries.
To renew that consensus, consultations shouldn’t be limited to the usual government and civil society elites. African citizens should be consulted to tease out their perceptions and expectations of the AU, its commission, and other agencies.
With elections for new staff scheduled for February 2025, member states must discuss the shape of the commission. It is time to ask: what is the nature of the AU Commission we want? African citizens should be given a voice through polls that could be run by the experienced survey organisation, Afrobarometer.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.
In its current form, the commission has to navigate contradictory trends. While the Pan-Africanist ideal has never been stronger in the rhetoric of African citizens and elites, the resurgence of nationalism helps coup leaders mobilise disgruntled populations.
Difficult conversations should start around key dimensions of African unity. Should free movement of people be a priority on a continent where border control and management are uneven? Is an African federation or confederation possible when member states exercise poor control over their territories?
African governments are unclear about the direction they would like the AU and its commission to take. Member states know the commission they do not want – but show limited interest in projecting it into the future.
Innovative thinking, wide-ranging inclusive dialogues, and the resolve to create an ‘AU Commission We Want’ are needed more than ever.
Paul-Simon Handy, Regional Director East Africa and Representative to the African Union, ISS Addis Ababa
Félicité Djilo, Independent Analyst, ISS
Read the original article on ISS.
AllAfrica publishes around 500 reports a day from more than 100 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.
AllAfrica is a voice of, by and about Africa – aggregating, producing and distributing 500 news and information items daily from over 100 African news organizations and our own reporters to an African and global public. We operate from Cape Town, Dakar, Abuja, Johannesburg, Nairobi and Washington DC.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.

source

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Local

Africa: Martin Luther King Jr's Legacy On Health Equity Through the Eyes of a Black African Doctor

Published

on

0 Views

Washington DC — Every year, January 20 is celebrated as Martin Luther King Jr. Day. He was a leader in the Civil Rights Movement who fought for equality and justice, especially for Black people, through peaceful protests and powerful speeches. The day is observed annually on the third Monday of January, close to his birthday on January 15. It is a time to remember his work, reflect on his message of fairness and nonviolence, and engage in acts of service to help others in our communities.
As a global health equity advocate, MLK Day holds special significance for me as a day to remember him as a health equity champion. He rightly identified health inequity as the worst form of social injustice. In his 1966 speech at the Second National Convention of the Medical Committee for Human Rights, MLK stated, “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health is the most shocking and inhuman”. I couldn’t agree more.
Globally, health inequities are numerous and mostly preventable. Neglected Tropical Diseases, maternal deaths, and malnutrition vividly reflect the global health injustices MLK foresaw
Growing up in Nigeria as a high school student in the 1980s, I was introduced to MLK through reading editions of Ebony magazine. I remember with nostalgia how I walked to roadside book sellers to buy old copies of the magazine.
These magazines introduced me to Black American social justice debates, including the works of MLK and Thurgood Marshall. It was an opportunity to connect spiritually with Africans in the diaspora – Black Americans – and their struggles. What struck me most as a child was MLK’s nonviolent demand for racial justice.
After high school, I went on to medical school in Nigeria to begin my training as a doctor. By the time I graduated in 1998, it was clear to me that patients’ rights must be respected in healthcare delivery. As health workers, we must prioritize preventive care while providing the care our patients need.
At the time, I did not know the right term for my convictions. Decades into my work in global health, I came to understand the term for my beliefs: health equity. In 2018, I delivered my first TEDx talk titled “Without Health We Have Nothing“. This is why MLK’s assertion that health injustice is the worst form of inequality resonates deeply with me. Healthcare – or its absence – is truly a matter of life and death.
Globally, health inequities are numerous and mostly preventable. Neglected Tropical Diseases, maternal deaths, and malnutrition vividly reflect the global health injustices MLK foresaw.
Neglected Tropical Diseases
Want to see a perfect example of diseases that disproportionately affect poor people? Look no further than Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs). These diseases affect 1.6 billion people globally, primarily in Africa and Asia. Many people do not realize some, like those mentioned in the Bible, still exist today.
A prime example is leprosy – a slow-growing bacterial infection that affects the skin, nerves, and sometimes the eyes and nose. Surprisingly, in 2024, the U.S. saw a significant rise in leprosy cases, particularly in the southeastern region, with central Florida identified as a hotspot.
Data reveals that approximately 34% of new cases reported between 2015 and 2020 were locally acquired. Without treatment, leprosy causes numb patches and potential deformities. Fortunately, leprosy is completely curable with antibiotics when caught early.
Other NTDs include river blindness, trachoma, and noma. Noma, in particular, is heartbreaking – it predominantly affects children between and six years who are malnourished, live in unhygienic conditions, or have weak immune systems.
Noma starts as a sore in the mouth but can destroy facial tissues, leaving severe deformities if untreated. Proper hygiene, nutrition, and healthcare can prevent noma, but it remains a reality in the poorest parts of the world.
Maternal Mortality
The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) captures the essence of safe motherhood with its statement: “No woman should die while giving life“. Tragically, for many women in low- and middle-income countries, and even wealthier nations, this isn’t the case.
In Nigeria alone, over 80,000 women die annually during pregnancy, childbirth, or shortly afterward. A professor once likened Nigeria’s high maternal mortality to filling a commercial jet with pregnant women every day and letting it crash – a haunting image. This huge injustice should not be allowed to continue.
In contrast, the United States of America has a higher maternal mortality rate compared to other wealthy countries, largely due to the disproportionately high maternal death rate among Black women. Black women are still 2 to 3 times more likely to die from pregnancy and childbirth than White women, regardless of their education level or socioeconomic status.
The solutions to stopping maternal deaths are not rocket science. Prenatal care must identify high-risk pregnancies, and women need access to proper nutrition to reduce the risks of postpartum hemorrhage, the leading cause of maternal deaths. With proper planning and preparation, including access to cesarean sections and emergency services, these deaths are preventable. Addressing these gaps would save countless lives.
Malnutrition
Malnutrition is a double-edged sword – it manifests as undernutrition (not enough nutrients) or overnutrition (eating too much). Both forms can be deadly, especially for children under five. Undernourished children fail to grow properly (wasting) and suffer impaired brain development, leading to stunting.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.
Globally, 22% of children are stunted, with 90% of cases occurring in Africa and Asia. On the other hand, overnutrition causes obesity, increasing the risk of non-communicable diseases like diabetes.
The solutions are simple: Support mothers to breastfeed exclusively for six months, educate communities on using affordable, local foods to prepare nutritious meals, and invest in school feeding programs. These steps would dramatically reduce malnutrition’s toll.
MLK’s vision for health justice shapes my global health equity journey. On MLK Day, let us reflect on global health injustices and commit to ending them. Identify one health issue you are passionate about and take meaningful action to address it.
MLK was right – health injustice is the worst form of inequality because without health we have nothing.
Happy MLK Day!
Dr. Ifeanyi M. Nsofor, a public-health physician, global health equity advocate and behavioral-science researcher, serves on the Global Fellows Advisory Board at the Atlantic Institute, Oxford, United Kingdom. You can follow him @Ifeanyi Nsofor, MD on LinkedIn
Follow @ekemma
Read the original article on IPS.
AllAfrica publishes around 400 reports a day from more than 110 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.
AllAfrica is a voice of, by and about Africa – aggregating, producing and distributing 400 news and information items daily from over 110 African news organizations and our own reporters to an African and global public. We operate from Cape Town, Dakar, Abuja, Johannesburg, Nairobi and Washington DC.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.

source

Continue Reading

Local

Africa: Holders Zamalek Lead Star-Studded TotalEnergies Confederation Cup Quarter-Finals

Published

on

2 Views

The TotalEnergies CAF Confederation Cup quarter-final line-up has been finalised with defending champions Zamalek leading a formidable array of clubs into the knock-out stages.
Eight teams from six nations will battle for continental glory when the quarter-finals commence on March 30, with the return legs scheduled for April 6.
Zamalek, who topped Group D with an impressive 14 points, are joined by fellow Egyptian side Al-Masry in the knockout stages.
The White Knights sealed their progress with a convincing 3-1 victory over Nigeria’s Enyimba on Sunday on the final matchday.
Tanzania’s Simba SC emerged as Group A winners, with Algeria’s CS Constantine securing second place.
Morocco’s Renaissance Berkane, previous winners of the competition, topped Group B ahead of South African debutants Stellenbosch.
USM Alger’s dominant Group C campaign saw them accumulate 14 points, while ASEC Mimosas of Cote d’Ivoire dramatically claimed the final quarter-final berth with a convincing victory on the last day.
The quarter-final draw will prevent teams from the same group meeting, meaning Egyptian rivals Zamalek and Al-Masry cannot face each other until at least the semi-finals.
Zamalek will face one of CS Constantine, Stellenbosch, or ASEC Mimosas, while Al-Masry could meet Simba, Berkane, or USM Alger.
The tournament’s knockout phase structure ensures home advantage will be crucial, with group winners hosting the decisive second legs. The semi-finals are scheduled for April 20 and 27, with the two-legged final set for May 17 and 25.
The presence of former champions Zamalek and Berkane, alongside ambitious clubs like Simba and USM Alger, suggests an intriguing battle lies ahead for Africa’s second-tier club crown.
Read the original article on CAF.
AllAfrica publishes around 400 reports a day from more than 110 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.
AllAfrica is a voice of, by and about Africa – aggregating, producing and distributing 400 news and information items daily from over 110 African news organizations and our own reporters to an African and global public. We operate from Cape Town, Dakar, Abuja, Johannesburg, Nairobi and Washington DC.
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy.
Almost finished…
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the process, please follow the instructions in the email we just sent you.
There was a problem processing your submission. Please try again later.

source

Continue Reading

Local

ConCourt dismisses bid to block Petauke by-election

Published

on

4 Views

By Hannock Kasama

The Constitutional Court has dismissed the application for a Conservatory Order to halt the PETAUKE Central Constituency by-election.

The application was recently filed by Governance Activist, ISAAC MWANZA and Zambia Civil Liberties Union.

However, the Constitutional Court has ruled that the application by Mr. MWANZA and the Zambia Civil Liberties Union has not outweighed public interest to hold the PETAUKE Central by-election.

Constitutional Court Judge, MATHEWS CHISUNKA has also ruled that Mr. MWANZA and the Zambia Civil Liberties Union have not demonstrated any prejudice they would suffer on account of the holding of the PETAUKE Central by-election.

Mr. MWANZA and the Zambia Civil Liberties Union had filed a petition in the Constitutional Court challenging the constitutionality of National Assembly Speaker NELLY MUTTI’s declaration of the PETAUKE Central seat vacant.

The post ConCourt dismisses bid to block Petauke by-election appeared first on ZNBC-Just for you.

source

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 an24.africa